Tristan Lamasine vs Eric Vanshelboim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve points won are nearly identical, with Vanshelboim at 43.24% and Lamasine slightly lower at 43.19%. Does this small margin impact the outcome? Typically, it slightly favors Vanshelboim.
• Vanshelboim excels in return games, securing 47.31% of second serve points, whereas Lamasine only manages 44.39%. This suggests Vanshelboim might have an edge returning serves.
• First serve return stats show Vanshelboim leads with 31.36%, compared to Lamasine's 29%. Could this indicate a stronger defensive game for Vanshelboim? Likely, yes.
• Under pressure, Lamasine performs better, saving 56.73% of breakpoints, as opposed to Vanshelboim’s 51.27%. This could be crucial in tight moments.
• Over the past year, Vanshelboim boasts a higher match win percentage at 59.42%, compared to Lamasine's 49.06%. This might imply a more consistent player in Vanshelboim.
• Vanshelboim is strongest on Clay with a 65% win rate, while Lamasine prefers Hard courts with a 58% win rate. What surface favors whom? Clay likely benefits Vanshelboim.
• Lamasine plays tougher opponents, with an average rank of 386.77 against Vanshelboim's 434.77. Does facing stronger competitors sharpen Lamasine’s skills? It potentially does.
• When a match reaches a deciding set, Vanshelboim excels with a 68% win rate, versus Lamasine's 54%. Vanshelboim seems more resilient in critical moments.
• In breakpoint conversion, Vanshelboim converts at 40%, outmatching Lamasine’s 33.54%. This efficiency can be decisive in game-turning situations.
• Both players have played most of their matches at Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, with Lamasine having a slightly better win rate of 65.52% compared to Vanshelboim’s 61.11%. What does this indicate in terms of lower level events? Lamasine has been a bit more successful.

Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):

As we analyze the players' statistics and performance over the past year, a few key points emerge. Vanshelboim shows a slight advantage in second serve returns, suggesting a potential edge in rally games.

The consistency shown by Vanshelboim with a higher match win percentage over the last year, combined with his impressive conversion rate on breakpoints, can pose significant challenges for Lamasine.

While Lamasine excels under pressure by saving more breakpoints and competes against slightly stronger opponents, Vanshelboim's better performance in crucial deciding sets might give him the resilience needed to clinch tight matches.

Considering these factors, along with Vanshelboim's historically superior performance on his preferred surface, he appears to be the more likely winner in this upcoming match.